next up previous contents
Next: Simulation Up: thesis Previous: Background and problem formulation   Contents

Subsections


Ad hoc routing protocols

The world of ad hoc protocols is evolving very fast and new drafts pop-up all the time. Sadly, drafts are removed and not archived within six months if they are not maintained. This creates a huge problem if you try to get a view of what has done within the field during the latest years. In order to hopefully not reinvent the wheel I tried to compile a list ([*]) of the existing protocols.

This section begin with a brief description of how the AODV algorithm work to give a quick introduction to an ad hoc protocol. This is also the protocol we used in the testbed.

Brief description of the AODV algorithm

As many ad hoc routing protocols an AODV-node informs its neighbours about its own existence by constantly sending ``hello messages'' at a defined interval. This enables all nodes to know the status about their neighbours, i.e. if they gone down or moved out of reach.

To resolve a route to another node in the network AODV floods its neighbours with a route request(RREQ). A RREQ contain the senders address, the address of the sought node and the last sequence number received from that node if there exist one. The receiving node checks if it has a route to the specified node. If a route exists and the sequence-number for this is higher than the supplied a new route is found. The node replies to the requesting by sending a route reply (RREP). If on the other hand a route does not exist the receiving node sends a RREQ itself to try to find a route for the requesting node.

If the original node does not receive an answer within a time-limit the node can deduce that the sought node are unreachable. Since the request was sent to all neighbours the node may end up with several routes but they are easily separated by the sequence numbers. nodes along the route keep their routing tables updated as long as traffic flows along the route. If not, the nodes will discard the routing entries after a specified time. To be sure that the route still exists, the sender has to keep the route alive by periodically sending packets. All nodes along the route are responsible for the upstream links which means that a broken link will be discovered by the closest node. This node signal the broken link by sending an error message (RRERR) downstream so that the using nodes can start to search for a new route.

AODV is a pretty simple routing-scheme. It has low overhead and supports multicast, but requires symmetric links. The on-demand structure makes it along with DSR very power efficient as stated by [113].


List of protocols

This is an attempt to assemble a list containing most of the ad hoc protocols found on the Net. It became clear that there were many protocols but no survey over them all. Since drafts are removed from IETF when they are not continually supported I have collected abstracts from drafts I have come across in order to create a small reference. This can be found the Appendix  [*].

The protocols are sorted based on the type of routing they use. The classic pro-active type updates the routingtables on a regular basis compared to the reactive where they only are updated when requested. The reactive type is very popular in ad hoc networks since they adapt fast which is a key feature. Then there is the hierarchical type which usually combine two or more strategies to create several routing-layers. Routing based on geographical information have also been used but usually requires extra equipment compared to the other protocols. Last of the unicast-protocols' are the power-aware that optimize usage of the power stored in the nodes. And last there are two sections with multicast protocols.

Pro-active: (Table-driven)
CGSR Clusterhead Gateway Switch Routing protocol [23]
DBF Distributed Bellman-Ford routing protocol [21]
DSDV Distance Source Distance Vector routing protocol [19]
DTDV Higly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing protocol [6]
HSLS Hazy Sighted Link State routing protocol [62]
HSR Hierarchical State Routing protocol
LCA Linked Cluster Architecture [60]
MMBDP Mobile Mesh Border Discovery Protocol [63] ([*])
MMLDP Mobile Mesh Link Discovery Protocol  [64] ([*])
MMRP Mobile Mesh Routing Protocol [65] ([*])
OLSR Optimized Link State Routing Protocol [39] ([*])
STAR Source Tree Adaptive routing protocol [9] ([*])
TBRPF Topology Broadcast based on Reverse-Path Forwarding routing protocol [40] ([*])
WRP Wireless Routing Protocol [22]

Reactive: (On-demand)
ABR Associativity Based Routing protocol [31] ([*])
AODV Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector routing protocol [4] ([*])
BSR Backup Source Routing protocol [32]
DSR Dynamic Source Routing protocol [41] ([*])
DSRFLOW Flow State in the Dynamic Source Routing protocol [43] ([*])
FORP Flow Oriented Routing Protocol [34]
LMR Lightweight Mobile Routing protocol [29]
LUNAR Lightweight Underlay Network Ad hoc Routing [3] ([*])
RDMAR Relative-Distance Micro-discovery Ad hoc Routing protocol [10]
SSR Signal Stability Routing protocol [33]
TORA Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm routing protocol [28] ([*])

Hierarchical:
CBRP Cluster Based Routing Protocol [8] ([*])
CEDAR Core Extraction Distributed Ad hoc Routing [51] ([*])
DDR Distributed Dynamic Routing Algorithm [35]
GSR Global State Routing protocol [17]
FSR Fisheye State Routing protocol [38] ([*])
HARP Hybrid Ad Hoc Routing Protocol [36]
HSR Host Specific Routing protocol [18] ([*])
LANMAR Landmark Routing Protocol for Large Scale Networks [7] ([*])
ZRP Zone Routing Protocol protocol [24] ([*])
BRP Bordercast Resolution Protocol [25] ([*])
IARP Intrazone Routing Protocol [26] ([*])
IERP Interzone Routing Protocol [27] ([*])

Geographical:
DREAM Distance Routing Effect Algorithm for Mobility [44]
GLS(Grid) Geographic Location Service [46]
LAR Location-Aided Routing protocol [45]
ZHLS Zone-Based Hierarchical Link State Routing [61]

Power aware:
ISAIAH Infra-Structure Aodv for Infrastructured Ad Hoc networks [5]
PARO Power-Aware Routing Optimization Protocol [37]
PAMAS PAMAS-Power Aware Multi Access Protocol with Signaling Ad Hoc Networks [52]

Multicast:
ABAM On-Demand Associativity-Based Multicast [53]
ADMR Adaptive Demand-Driven Multicast Routing protocol [47] ([*])
AMRIS Ad hoc Multicast Routing protocol utilising Increasing id-numbers [13]
AMRoute Ad hoc Multicast Routing Protocol [12]
CAMP Core-Assisted Mesh Protocol [14]
CBM Content Based Multicast [15]
DDM Differential Destination Multicast [20] ([*])
FGMP Forwarding Group Multicast Protocol [54]
LAM Lightweight Adaptive Multicast protocol [16]
DSR-MB Simple Protocol for Multicast and Broadcast using DSR [42] ([*])
MAODV Multicast Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector routing [50] ([*])
MCEDAR Multicast CEDAR [55]
MZR Multicast Zone Routing protocol [48] ([*])
ODMRP On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol [11]
SRMP Source Routing-based Multicast Protocol [49] ([*])

Geograpical Multicast (Geocasting):
LBM Location Based Multicast [56]
GeoGRID Geographical GRID (see GLS) [57]
GeoTORA Geographical TORA (see TORA) [58]
MRGR Mesh-Based Geocast Routing [59]


next up previous contents
Next: Simulation Up: thesis Previous: Background and problem formulation   Contents
David Lundberg 2002-11-15